Scholar's blog conclusions

In Shanks blogsite, he had a variety of topics and postings that resemble academic inquiry in so many ways, however the way he had to present the material for our analysis is in a very different form to what we are used to, he has to make very basic points for our interpretation. This is a way to keep appeal by the reader online, I feel that reading line after line on the web gets really redundant and people will have an "ADHD" result of doing so, and will not be able to grasp the various framework that is produced by Shank.

The use of a blog as a medium seems to be through making multiple general posts to give an overall accumulation of material for his work, that he then represents I believe to help understand him on a personal level, in a sense of his beliefs. The site is a hybrid between the questions of it's professionalism and the lack of... It is presented in a professional manner that shows different framework to give an overall controlling purpose. I feel it keeps a generally broad spectrum of perspective that shows he is making all these posts through personal ideals, and core beliefs.